AI作者：字典

AI作者1：字典（著作权法、D出版社、编辑）

 

李东涛

 

这是我的父亲吗?

我亲爱的朋友。¹

这是一个关于“父亲”的案子。

原告系Ｄ出版社（以下简称Ｄ）的一个退休编辑。

被告为一网络公司。

1997年3月，Ｄ决定出版一本新的英汉词典（以下简称词典），并指派原告和其他三个编辑担任主编。在出书过程中，Ｄ负责提供全部必要条件，包括资金。该书出版前由D负责定稿。

1997年9月，原告在词典的创作工作完成之后办理了退休手续。

1998年1月，D出版了词典，作者署名为“Ｄ出版社编写组”。

3年后，经D授权，被告将词典部分内容上传到其商业网站上。

原告状告被告著作权侵权。

被告否认侵权，理由是已取得Ｄ的授权。

法院判决原告所诉著作权侵权不能成立，因为词典的作者和著作权人是D。

简而言之，原告不是父亲（作者），不是亲爱的朋友。

 

 

AI.Author I: The Dictionary (copyright law//publishing house/editor)

 

Li Dongtao

 

Is this my father, my dearest friend?  

This is a case about “father”.

The plaintiff is a retired editor from publishing house D (hereinafter referred to as “D”). 

The defendant is a .com company.

In May 1997, publishing house D decided to publish a new English-Chinese dictionary (hereinafter referred to as “the dictionary”) and commissioned the plaintiff and three other editors to finish the job. In support of the task, D agreed to provide all of the necessary materials, including the money, and D would have the final say about the dictionary. 

In September 1997, the plaintiff retired after the work on the dictionary was completed.

In January 1998, the dictionary was published by D, the author was mentioned as “Editing Group of D”. LDT

3 years later, licensed by D, the defendant uploaded part of the dictionary onto its commercial website.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for copyright infringement.

The defendant argued that the copyright infringement was not established because it had gotten license from D.

The court ruled that the copyright infringement was not established because the author and the copyright owner was D, not the plaintiff.

In short, an editor isn’t the father (author), the dearest friend.

 

 

AI作者2：谁是“父亲”？

 

李东涛

 

歌德说过,作者是作品之父。

原告自认为是字典之父，但他忘记了在词典的创作过程中，他是和其他三位编辑一起接受D 的指派来完成工作任务， 而且，为了支持这项工作，D提供了全部必要条件，包括资金，该书出版也由D负责承担责任。

简而言之, “父亲”的权利依法应受保护,但我们必须首先确定谁是“父亲”。

 

AI.Author II: Who Is Father?

 

Li Dongtao

 

“A work is the same as the son of the author.” Goethe said.

The plaintiff thought he was the copyright owner of the dictionary, but he forgot that in the process of creating the dictionary, D commissioned him and three other editors to finish the job; and, in support of the task, D had provided all of the necessary materials, including the money, and, D would take the whole liability about the dictionary.

In a nutshell, a father’s right should be protected, but we must first know who “the father” is.

 

 

AI.作者3：输出结果

 

李东涛

 

我们需要换一个角度来观察事物。²

一个AI输出结果是一个作品？

一个AI系统，不论是ChatGPT还是Sora, 都是基于学习的模式，是被很多的数据训练出来的：它首先学习数据内容，包括人类的作品，然后识别并复制数据；它的输出结果是基于一种功能，而不是基于思考。

因此，一个AI系统不是作者，它的输出结果也不是作品。

 

 

AI.Author III: The Output

 

Li Dongtao

 

We need to see things in a different way.

An AI-generated output is a copyrightable work?

An AI system, either ChatGPT or Sora, is a learning model, it is trained on a vast amount of data: it must first learn from data, including real works of actual humans, then it works by identifying and replicating data. Its output is from functioning, not thinking.

As a result, an AI system is not an author, an AI-generated output is not a work.

 

 

 

 

 

 

版权信息: © 2024 Li Dontao Copyright Reserved.（© 2024 李东涛 版权所有）；